My guess, the Rubicon. I wanted the Rubicon 4xe (for looks more than serious off-roading) but the Sahara 4xe was already a financial stretch and I just could not pull the trigger on a Rubicon. But in an attempt to justify the higher price, I did consider the resale value and after a little research concluded that the Rubicon would be easier to sell later and probably hold its value a little better, (although as you know Wranglers are great in general at holding their value).So I already ordered my Sahara 4XE but I can’t seem to wonder 💭 if the Rubicon would have better resale value in 3 years?
I wanted the slightly better on road ride so I chose Sahara.
Rubicon always has better resaleSo I already ordered my Sahara 4XE but I can’t seem to wonder 💭 if the Rubicon would have better resale value in 3 years?
I wanted the slightly better on road ride so I chose Sahara.
Those proposed tax credit changes would also lower the credit on new 4XE to $4,000 (because battery is smaller than 40kwh).As has been mentioned, the PHEV factor is really an unknown. Especially given that only new buyers are eligible for the $7500 tax credit. There have been several potential changes floated to the tax credit, including one that would give a $2500 credit to those that buy a used PHEV, but I'm not putting a lot of faith in those changes making it through Congress.
My Sahara 4xe is my first Jeep and I honestly haven't looked much into the market of used models, but I would still expect the normal factors like mileage, condition, history (maintenance and accidents) to weigh heavily coupled with what features a model has. As someone said, I would expect a fully-loaded Sahara would still go for more than a low-end Rubicon if they had similar normal factors.
There's also another proposal that would raise the credit to $12,500, but also change the credit to 1) only apply to vehicles less that $40k MSRP and 2) only apply to buyers whose income is less than $100k.Those proposed tax credit changes would also lower the credit on new 4XE to $4,000 (because battery is smaller than 40kwh).
It's not clear to me if the "bonus" incentives of being assembled at a union plant with batteries sourcing 50% of components from USA can be added on top, but current reading makes it sound like all vehicles with batteries under 40kwh are capped at $4,000. If true that could give the resale some buoyancy for those who bought with the $7,500 credit.
Yeah, clearly this continues to develop. The version I'm mentioning is fairly recent (last week) and is also a $12,500 version, but the income cap is higher ($400k) and vehicle cost cap broken out by category:There's also another proposal that would raise the credit to $12,500, but also change the credit to 1) only apply to vehicles less that $40k MSRP and 2) only apply to buyers whose income is less than $100k.
The infrastructure bills the changes would be part of appear to be collapsing in the Senate for numerous issues, so I’m not expecting anything to get passed at this point!Yeah, clearly this continues to develop. The version I'm mentioning is fairly recent (last week) and is also a $12,500 version, but the income cap is higher ($400k) and vehicle cost cap broken out by category:
Hard to keep up with which versions are most recent, will just have to let the cards fall where they may.
- Sedans under $55,000
- SUVs under $69,000
- Pickup trucks under $74,000
- Vans under $54,000
![]()
Dems propose new $12,500 electric car rebate, Tesla left with $4,500 disadvantage
Democrats have proposed an updated electric car incentive program at the federal level, which would go through their $3.5 trillion social spending bill. It would remove the limit on the number of vehicles and replace it with a timeline, introduce a higher payout up to $12,500 and make it...electrek.co